The Channels

Campus Center to be destroyed; City College may not rebuild


Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.

Email This Story

The administration is recommending that City College not rebuild the soon-to-be demolished Campus Center, which houses the cafeteria and school of culinary arts because the new building would cost $7 million more than budgeted to rebuild.

The center will be demolished at the end of this school year because of health and safety issues, as well as a lack of funding to meet state remodeling requirements.

The recommendation to not rebuild the center was announced by Superintedent-President Dr. Anthony Beebe and Chief Budget Officer Joe Sullivan during the Tuesday College Planning Council meeting. The proposal comes from the college’s need to decrease annual spending. If the recommendation is accepted by the Board of Trustees, the center would not be rebuilt in the foreseeable future, and voters would need to pass a construction bond, which could happen years after its removal.

“We consider the building unsafe given today’s standards,” said Sullivan in an interview with The Channels this morning.

“We don’t want to risk it any longer,” he said, explaining that deterioration of the building is not up to current seismic code and is unstable.

Sullivan added that over the years concrete has been added to the pillars at the base of the building to support its eroding steel and rebar. The erosion is decreasing the building’s likelihood of standing against a massive earthquake.

The cafeteria, Buzz Shack, Natural Bowls, English as a second language department and classrooms, school of culinary arts, STEM lab, Student Senate meeting room and the office of student life are all housed within the center.

Joe Sullivan, College Planning Council Vice President of Business Services, 2015.

Daniel Feldtkeller
Joe Sullivan, vice president of business services, 2015.

The JSB Cafe, John Dunn Gourmet Dining Room and Favela burrito shack, which are adjacent to the center, will not be taken down, and a temporary food facility will be placed in front of the Student Services Building. The area where the center stands would be left empty until a measure was passed to build a new one, Sullivan said.

Several council members during the meeting expressed concern about attracting students to the campus without a center because it holds an array of student amenities.

Rebuilding the center would cost an estimated $30 million. The state would pay the college $20 million toward the costs, and the college would need to come up with the remaining $10 million, as well as an additional $7 million for various unplanned expenses. If the college doesn’t rebuild the center at this time the college must return the $20 million to the state.

The bids are inflated because of the competitive construction market from a current statewide shortage of construction workers, especially in Santa Barbara, Sullivan said. The local construction labor force does not have enough workers for a project of this size, and construction costs in California are at a 30 percent spike.

Currently the college cannot afford the heavy construction expenses because of a continued fall in enrollment leading to a lack of funding. Currently the college is deeply involved in major budget reductions, such as the early retirement program, which was introduced to faculty and other campus employees this semester. An expense this large would almost double the college’s current deficit.

Sullivan stressed that saving the money rather than spending it on the project does not completely solve the college’s financial crunch.

“These are one time funds,” Sullivan said. “This fiscal crisis is because we lost revenue and we haven’t balanced our revenue with expenses. This is a significant drop in revenue.”

Sullivan said the climbing cost of housing can be correlated with the decline of students enrolled full-time.

“A lot of students come from out of the area and just can’t afford to live here,” he said, adding that many non-local students have to leave Santa Barbara because its steep cost of living.

The culinary arts classrooms will be moved into the portable buildings on East Campus where the Campus Store is temporarily located during its reconstruction.

“We are actually in a better position in our program with this project,” said Randy Bublitz, chair of the culinary program. “Once a new Campus Center is eventually built, it benefits us because it will be a better building with state-of-the art equipment.”

Bublitz said the demolition will not hurt the program because the JSB Cafe and John Dunn Gourmet Dining Room, the two restaurants where culinary arts students cook, are not being taken down.

“It’s a better fit for us in terms of what we can offer the students. In that sense, it’s a better stance for students,” Bublitz added. “We have to make the best of a situation, so this is probably the best outcome.”

Currently, there is no set plan for the relocation of the other programs and organizations located in the center, however they will be relocated to temporary locations.

Marc Sullivan, director of food service, was unavailable Wednesday morning for an interview about the demolition.

The recommendation will be passed on to the Board of Trustees for further action at its meeting at 4 p.m. Thursday, Oct. 27, in the MacDougall Administration Building Room 218.

Clarification: Oct. 19, 2016

This version of the article includes the clarification that the other programs and organizations to be displaced by the demolition of the Campus Center will be relocated to temporary locations.

This version also clarifies that the current building is not up to current seismic codes. 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email


6 Responses to “Campus Center to be destroyed; City College may not rebuild”

  1. A.M. Arias del Cid on October 19th, 2016 12:29 pm

    Let’s design a building that costs less than $20 million.


  2. SBCC Staff on October 19th, 2016 12:35 pm

    And what about building something smaller scale to create safe spaces for students? Do-away with the culinary component and rather, house supportive services there (Office of Student Life, Wellness Connection, Equity). We need spaces for students to convene. This is crucial.


  3. Louise Talaico MacKenzie on October 19th, 2016 7:29 pm

    If the college does not want to rebuild or is considering not rebuilding the Campus Center, then why would they move forward with destroying it and leaving the campus without a Campus Center or with a make shift one that is temporary. Please do not destroy, unless there is a commitment to rebuild right away.


  4. Karl Blasius on October 19th, 2016 10:11 pm

    I like the suggestion of A.M. Arias del Cid, build a more modest structure, primarily to meet student needs. The current plan to leave the property vacant will read like sour grapes/revenge to voters facing a big tax increase in the future and will probably cause another embarassing defeat for SBCC administration at the ballot box. Not a pretty picture. . .


  5. Tony Milano on October 20th, 2016 9:38 am

    Blame the State for escalated costs. CA mandates prevailing wage rates be paid on all public works projects. All general laborers (broom pusher to clean the site) must be paid $52.00 per hour, carpenters are paid $57.00 per hour. I am quite confident 90% of CA residents are not aware of this. Exactly, why go to college when you can make those wages?


  6. Howard Green on October 27th, 2016 9:21 pm

    Please report on Trustee Meeting action on this topic.

    Shouldn’t space be allocated in the New West Campus building under construction for the offices now in the Center? When will this be completed (and we get bus service to West Campus again?


According to the Student Press Law center, several professional news outlets have recently revamped or removed their online comment sections in an attempt to create more civilized discourse. The Channels encourages readers to use our comment section. We view it as a forum for our students and local community to discuss the news that we publish. In an open forum like this, readers are free to express themselves with certain guidelines. The Channels will refrain from approving the publication of comments that are: promoting private materials, containing personal contact information, personal attacks towards our staff, threatening or disparaging, libelous, an invasion of privacy towards the writer or source, obscene or hateful, or content that does not adhere to The Channels or community standards.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.

Navigate Right
Navigate Left
  • Academic

    How to drive student success topic of SBCC Faculty Lecture

  • Campus Center to be destroyed; City College may not rebuild

    Board of Trustees

    Board of Trustees approves student health fee increase

  • Campus Center to be destroyed; City College may not rebuild


    Staff, faculty emails and texts considered public record

  • Campus Center to be destroyed; City College may not rebuild

    Breaking News

    SBCC shut down, classes cancelled due to power outage

  • Campus Center to be destroyed; City College may not rebuild

    Breaking News

    White supremacy posters near SBCC cause concern

  • Campus Center to be destroyed; City College may not rebuild

    Breaking News

    Student senate postpones Amendment A election

  • Campus Center to be destroyed; City College may not rebuild

    Board of Trustees

    Non-residential student tuition to increase after Board of Trustees vote

  • Campus Center to be destroyed; City College may not rebuild


    Executive order puts nonnative students at risk for deportation

  • Campus Center to be destroyed; City College may not rebuild


    Council suggests new marketing hire to increase SBCC enrollment

  • Campus Center to be destroyed; City College may not rebuild

    Breaking News

    SBCC Student Senate approves budget, supports housing

The news site of Santa Barbara City College.
Campus Center to be destroyed; City College may not rebuild